Which of the following metrics used to evaluate recruitment success is least likely to be influenced by increasing the starting compensation for a position?

The metric that is least likely to be influenced by increasing the starting compensation for a position is the source of hire. This metric focuses on where candidates are sourced from, such as job boards, referrals, or social media, rather than factors related to compensation.

Increasing starting compensation may positively impact the offer acceptance rate, where candidates are more likely to accept a job offer if the pay is attractive. It can also affect time to fill, as higher salaries may help attract candidates more quickly, reducing the duration of the recruitment process. Similarly, candidate satisfaction can be impacted since higher compensation may lead to a more favorable perception of the hiring organization.

In contrast, the source of hire remains a constant that reflects recruitment strategy and channels rather than compensation levels. It primarily assesses the effectiveness of various recruitment sources rather than the financial incentives associated with the offers made to candidates. Therefore, this metric remains insulated from the fluctuations in starting compensation, making it the correct answer.