Which of the following is a benefit of specifying the criteria used for assessing candidate's work ethic?

Specifying the criteria used for assessing a candidate's work ethic significantly enhances the reliability of the selection process. When clear criteria are established, interviewers and evaluators have a consistent framework to evaluate candidates' responses and behaviors. This consistency helps to minimize subjectivity and bias, resulting in more reliable and valid assessments of each candidate's true work ethic.

A reliable selection process ensures that candidates are evaluated based on the same standards, which allows for fair comparisons among different applicants. This can lead to more informed hiring decisions based on objective measures, reducing the likelihood of hiring errors that can arise from personal biases or differing interpretations of what constitutes a strong work ethic.

In contrast, while expanding the candidate pool, reducing interview time, or achieving higher rates of candidate acceptance can be beneficial outcomes, they do not directly relate to the reliability of the evaluation process in the way that establishing clear assessment criteria does.