What might you do to improve a selection instrument that currently lacks validity?

Improving a selection instrument that lacks validity is essential for ensuring that the tools used for hiring are effectively measuring what they are intended to measure. Ensuring clarity in interview questions for better candidate comprehension directly addresses potential misunderstandings that can lead to inaccurate assessments of a candidate's abilities and fit for the role. When candidates do not fully understand the questions being asked, their responses may not accurately reflect their qualifications or thoughts. Clear, well-constructed questions can elicit more relevant and insightful responses, thereby enhancing the validity of the selection instrument.

In contrast, broadening the range of skills assessed might not necessarily improve validity if the additional skills are not pertinent to job performance. Solicit employee feedback on the questions could improve the content by making it more relevant, but it does not guarantee that the questions are clearly understood without ensuring their clarity first. Limiting interview duration to 30 minutes does not directly relate to improving validity, as it could result in insufficient time to properly assess a candidate's qualifications and fit. Therefore, focusing on clarity in questions is a crucial step in enhancing the overall validity of the selection instrument.