For which of the following organizations would the ranking method of job evaluation be most appropriately used to determine a job hierarchy?

The ranking method of job evaluation is most appropriate for organizations with a relatively small number of jobs or positions, where jobs can be easily compared to one another based on their overall importance or value to the organization. In the case of a local day spa with three locations, the workforce is likely to be smaller and the variety of positions may not be excessively complex. This allows for a straightforward comparison of jobs, where each can be ranked based on factors like responsibilities, skills required, and the impact on the overall operation of the spa.

In contrast, a multinational technology firm typically has a diverse range of job positions across various departments and locations, making ranking more challenging. Similarly, a government agency with numerous levels of hierarchy may have complex role interdependencies and a larger number of job classifications that require a more nuanced evaluation method. A large manufacturing plant also encompasses a wide range of job roles that may involve different skill sets, responsibilities, and operational dynamics, making job ranking less effective due to the complexity involved. Therefore, for a local day spa, the ranking method offers a practical and efficient way to establish job hierarchy, taking into account the limited scope of positions available.